New Delhi: During a discussion at a book-release function in Delhi's Nehru Memorial Museum and Library on Monday, Harish Khare, the Prime Minister's media adviser, articulated an unprecedented critique of the Congress.

This is the first time that Khare, a former journalist, has publicly criticised the party that leads the government that employs him.

Khare said that the argument for social change has to be made "in a larger frame of political respectability. Not (in the context of a) politics which rewards cynicism, family nepotism, bogus factionalism, groupism in the party, yet expects the larger body of citizens to make sacrifices". You will end up with "cronyism, crony capitalism, defeated initiatives", he said.

Attempt at social transformation will come to naught, he said, without a political strategy in place to deal with the inevitable conflict and resistance it provokes. And the attempt is doomed to fail, argued Khare, because "you can't change the Congress", still the country's largest party, to which "all good things and bad things in the country can be traced".

Digvijaya's initiatives on land redistribution to Dalits and Scheduled Tribes did not succeed in MP, said Khare, "because the party was not with him" -- it only "tolerated his politics of conviction" and therefore "he did not have the political space."
The Madhya Pradesh Congress, Khare said, is "a far cry from good politics", and his "supposed mentor Arjun Singh", who "was fighting the prime minister" at the time, was making "conflicting demands" on him (Digvijaya).

Digvijaya's experience in MP, Khare said, has "lessons for all of us": "Unless a political leadership is willing to totally overhaul existing administrative structures, no meaningful social transformation is possible," he said.
For Khare, the Congress's failure is also embedded in its larger framework of social alliances. The rhetoric in 1969-71, for instance, when the Congress was also "tinkering with legislation" in the face of "opposition from big business, party bosses" was followed by the inability to live up to the "architecture of expectations" it had aroused after it won the elections. Because "you (the Congress) had not chosen your allies... Then the urge for political consolidation and consensus. You try to have every camel in your tent and it becomes messy inside the tent -- a dilemma that the Congress has not sorted out".

Digvijaya said he disagreed with Khare's description of the Congress party as obstinately "status-quoist". But he admitted that "unfortunately, the party has not been able to keep pace with changes happening in the cow belt".
Source: Indian Express